Receive your FREE guide today!
Sign-up to our newsletter and we'll also send you our free ebook on building your dream body.
Everything you need to start your journey to good health.
Sign-up to our newsletter and we'll also send you our free ebook on building your dream body.
Everything you need to start your journey to good health.
Some dieters swear by keto; others by paleo, intermittent fasting, or veganism. Despite the apparent differences in these diverse diets, they can all work to attain weight loss - and it’s not because there’s some magical food you need to eat or remove.
These diets work because they reduce your calorie intake, creating a calorie deficit.
Let’s demystify the dieting code and discuss the science behind weight loss.
The first law of thermodynamics states that energy can neither be created nor destroyed: energy can only be transferred or changed from one form to another.
And although this isn’t a physics lesson, it applies to our physical pursuits: in order to lose fat, you must create an energy deficit.
When you provide your body with excess energy, the energy must go somewhere - so if you don’t burn it, you store it primarily as fat. In turn, your body will break down fat to use as energy only when you don’t obtain sufficient energy (i.e. calories) from your diet.
Consequently, there are three possible states for your body’s energy balance…
Throughout the day, your body fluctuates between calorie deficit (between meals) and surplus (upon eating). It’s your average energy balance across time, or “net energy balance” that ultimately determines weight loss, gain, or maintenance.
And any diet that accomplishes state #3 naturally results in weight loss…
Diets work by creating a calorie deficit. It’s not magic, it’s science.
You can create a calorie deficit by affecting both sides of the equation: by decreasing your calorie intake and/or increasing your energy expenditure. Let’s dive into each.
To reduce your calorie intake, you must eat less than you’re burning. More specifically, you need to limit the amount of macronutrients - that is, protein, fats, and carbs - that you consume. While overall calorie intake determines weight loss, the composition of macronutrients influences what type of weight is lost, such that you lose mainly fat and minimal muscle. When it comes to fat loss goals, typically fats or carbs are reduced while protein is kept fairly high.
Fortunately, you can limit your calorie intake without eliminating entire foods or macronutrients. And, in fact, a more flexible approach to dieting proves more sustainable in the long run. However, because humans are notoriously inaccurate at estimating portion sizes(1), tracking your macros can help ensure you hit the macro and calorie intake needed to achieve fat loss - while leaving space for less nutritious treats in your diet.
To effectively reduce your calorie intake to achieve long-term weight loss, you should also…
There are a variety of ways you can burn more calories to create a calorie deficit. Your total daily energy expenditure (TDEE) consists of four different components, each of which can be harnessed to boost your metabolism.
1. Resistance train to increase your resting metabolic rate (RMR): While resistance training isn’t necessary to lose weight, it does support overall health and longevity and is especially useful during weight loss. Muscle tissue raises your resting metabolic rate, as each pound of muscle burns approximately 6 calories at rest, versus 2 calories expended by fat tissue(9). Furthermore, resistance training appears to boost resting energy expenditure independent of muscle gain(10).
To maximize calorie expenditure and preserve muscle during a weight loss phase, aim to train each body part at least twice a week, with a focus on compound lifts, including variations of…
Resistance training for weight loss is designed no differently than resistance training during maintenance or bulking: use good form, challenge yourself, and strive to get stronger over time.
2. Increase your non-exercise activity thermogenesis (NEAT): NEAT refers to incidental physical activity that occurs throughout the day, in contrast to planned exercise.
NEAT includes activities like…
Although such activity may seem trivial, NEAT can have an appreciable effect on your metabolism. Of all components of TDEE, NEAT is the most variable and ranges from 100 to 800 calories daily(2) (some research even suggests that NEAT can vary by up to 2000 calories between individuals of similar size(3)). Factors such as occupation, lifestyle, age, genetics, body composition, and energy balance can influence levels of NEAT(4). You can intentionally increase your NEAT through minor lifestyle changes, such as…
3. Take advantage of the thermic effect of food (TEF): The food you eat contributes to your energy expenditure as well as your calorie intake: the thermic effect of food refers to the amount of energy required to digest and absorb macronutrients. Protein, in particular, has the highest thermic effect, as your body uses 20-30% of your calories from protein simply to break it down! In contrast, carbs and fats require much less energy to process (5-10% and 0-3%, respectively(8)).
If you want to take advantage of TEF to enhance your energy expenditure, follow a high-protein diet that contains foods like…
4. Increase your exercise activity thermogenesis (EAT): Though the effects of exercise on energy expenditure are largely overblown, upping your EAT can provide a modest boost to your metabolism when programmed appropriately. Like NEAT, EAT varies widely depending on the individual - and is affected by changes in body mass and in movement efficiency that comes with repeated practice. As a result, it’s best to use cardio sparingly and to save it for when you reach a weight loss plateau.
High-intensity interval training (HIIT) and low-intensity steady state (LISS) are the most popular forms of cardio used, each of which have their own advantages and disadvantages. While both increase energy expenditure, HIIT workouts burn comparable calories to LISS cardio but in a shorter time period(5). Moreover, HIIT preserves muscle(6) and boosts post-exercise energy expenditure(7) more than LISS. However, the high-intensity nature of HIIT is taxing on the nervous system, can interfere with recovery (and subsequent weight training), and can lead to injury if performed improperly.
If you choose to add cardio during a fat loss phase, incorporate it judiciously, starting with as little as one weekly workout and increasing as needed. Additionally, keep in mind that doing cardio is not a license to eat more and that its metabolism-boosting effects are relatively minor: one hour of low-impact cardio only burns ~300-400 calories, which is comparable to a small snack.
It isn’t always easy to eat less and burn more calories, especially if you’ve been in a severe calorie deficit or dieted for too long. The human body is incredibly adaptive to help us survive in a wide range of conditions, including those of famine. Consequently, your body uses various metabolic adaptations to counteract a calorie deficit, which are advantageous when food is truly scarce but can undermine your weight loss goals. Essentially, metabolic adaptation occurs to minimize your energy deficit so your weight remains stable, and what was once a calorie deficit becomes your new maintenance calories(11). Adaptations arise related to all aspects of TDEE…
1. Unconscious reduction in NEAT: NEAT naturally decreases during a calorie deficit and is further reduced in response to increased exercise, though the extent of this reduction varies across individuals(12, 13, 14, 15). To help counteract this adaptation, you can track your steps daily to ensure you’re consistently moving throughout the day(16) - and add in some walks if you find your step counts unintentionally declining.
2. Less energy expended during exercise: The more you practice a particular movement (for instance, running(17) or biking), the more efficient your mechanics become, and the less energy you expend to perform that exercise. Losing weight also contributes to less EAT, since it requires less energy to move when you’re lighter; and simply being in a calorie deficit, regardless of weight loss, seems to reduce energy expenditure during exercise(18).
3. Lower TEF due to lower calorie intake: Lowering your calorie intake inherently leads to a lower TEF, since your body will be processing less food. Nonetheless, by following a high-protein diet you’ll ensure you’re maximizing your TEF as much as possible despite dieting.
4. Muscle loss decreases RMR: Weight loss can involve some degree of muscle loss, which will decrease your resting metabolic rate. Those who start their diet fairly lean are particularly at risk for losing muscle - but even less-lean individuals can lose muscle mass without the proper precautions.
You can minimize muscle loss by…
While you can create a calorie deficit both by restricting calorie intake and by increasing energy output, you can only increase your energy expenditure so much - which is why your diet primarily drives the direction of your weight, and why everyone searches for the best diet.
Ultimately, the best diet is the one you’ll stick with: consistency and long-term adherence are essential to long-term weight loss(25).
For most people, the best, most sustainable diet will have a few common features. In general, the best diet is one that…
1. Is flexible: Eliminating entire foods or food groups is rarely sustainable - and forbidding yourself from consuming foods that you like creates a restrictive mindset that often fosters an unhealthy relationship with food(26). Learning to appreciate all foods and eat anything in moderation will make your diet more enjoyable and easier to keep up as a lifestyle.
2. Includes adequate protein: Protein has numerous benefits, from promoting satiety to building and preserving muscle. Following a high-protein diet will not only prevent overeating but also ensure you attain the body composition you desire(27).
3. Emphasizes whole foods: Whole foods like meat, veggies, and fruit are both nutritious(28) and satiating(29) and thus should be a cornerstone of any sustainable and healthy diet. While highly processed foods are fine in moderation, they’re highly palatable, more calorie-dense, and less filling, which can predispose overconsumption.
4. Fits your lifestyle: A diet that doesn’t fit your lifestyle will never last. If you find intermittent fasting or time-restricted eating works for you, go for it! If you prefer eating larger, less frequent meals throughout the day, do it! Every body and life is different, so consider your personal preferences and schedule when determining the right diet for you.
Lastly, it’s important to realize the role of small steps and habit formation in sustainable weight loss and dieting. Radically overhauling your current diet due to a burst of motivation is often too dramatic a shift to keep up. Instead, consider making smaller, more do-able tweaks to your nutrition and maintaining them over time, so you develop habits. In the end, your day-to-day behavior depends more on habits than willpower, so making healthy choices automatic simplifies the dieting process and supports lasting results(30).
1. Young, L. R., & Nestle, M. (1998). Variation in perceptions of a ‘medium’ food portion: implications for dietary guidance. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 98(4), 458–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-8223(98)00103-5.
2. Ravussin, E., et al., Determinants of 24-hour energy expenditure in man. Methods and results using a respiratory chamber. J Clin Invest, 1986. 78(6): p. 1568-78.
3. von Loeffelholz, C., & Birkenfeld, A. (2018). The Role of Non-exercise Activity Thermogenesis in Human Obesity. In K. R. Feingold (Eds.) et. al., Endotext. MDText.com, Inc.
4. Levine J. A. (2003). Non-exercise activity thermogenesis. The Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 62(3), 667–679. https://doi.org/10.1079/PNS2003281
5. Burgomaster, K. A., Howarth, K. R., Phillips, S. M., Rakobowchuk, M., Macdonald, M. J., McGee, S. L., & Gibala, M. J. (2008). Similar metabolic adaptations during exercise after low volume sprint interval and traditional endurance training in humans. The Journal of physiology, 586(1), 151–160. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2007.142109
6. Wilson, J. M., Marin, P. J., Rhea, M. R., Wilson, S. M., Loenneke, J. P., & Anderson, J. C. (2012). Concurrent training: a meta-analysis examining interference of aerobic and resistance exercises. Journal of strength and conditioning research, 26(8), 2293–2307. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e31823a3e2d
7. Laforgia, J., Withers, R. T., Shipp, N. J., & Gore, C. J. (1997). Comparison of energy expenditure elevations after submaximal and supramaximal running. Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985), 82(2), 661–666. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1997.82.2.661
8. Tappy L. (1996). Thermic effect of food and sympathetic nervous system activity in humans. Reproduction, nutrition, development, 36(4), 391–397. https://doi.org/10.1051/rnd:19960405
9. Wang, Z., Heshka, S., Zhang, K., Boozer, C. N., & Heymsfield, S. B. (2001). Resting energy expenditure: systematic organization and critique of prediction methods. Obesity research, 9(5), 331–336. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2001.42
10. Stavres, J., Zeigler, M. P., & Pasternostro Bayles, M. (2018). Six weeks of moderate functional resistance training increases basal metabolic rate in sedentary adult women. International Journal of Exercise Science, 11(2), 32-41.
11. Trexler, E. T., Smith-Ryan, A. E., & Norton, L. E. (2014). Metabolic adaptation to weight loss: implications for the athlete. Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 11(1), 7.
12. Leibel, R.L., M. Rosenbaum, and J. Hirsch, Changes in energy expenditure resulting from altered body weight. N Engl J Med, 1995. 332(10): p. 621-8.
13. Martin, C.K., et al., Effect of calorie restriction on resting metabolic rate and spontaneous physical activity. Obesity (Silver Spring), 2007. 15(12): p. 2964-73.
14. Martin, C.K., et al., Effect of calorie restriction on the free-living physical activity levels of nonobese humans: results of three randomized trials. J Appl Physiol (1985), 2011. 110(4): p. 956-63.
15. King, N.A., et al., Metabolic and behavioral compensatory responses to exercise interventions: barriers to weight loss. Obesity (Silver Spring), 2007. 15(6): p. 1373-83.
16. Bravata, D.M., et al., Using pedometers to increase physical activity and improve health: a systematic review. JAMA, 2007. 298(19): p. 2296-304.
17. Barnes, K. R., & Kilding, A. E. (2015). Running economy: measurement, norms, and determining factors. Sports medicine - open, 1(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-015-0007-y
18. Goldsmith, R., Joanisse, D. R., Gallagher, D., Pavlovich, K., Shamoon, E., Leibel, R. L., & Rosenbaum, M. (2010). Effects of experimental weight perturbation on skeletal muscle work efficiency, fuel utilization, and biochemistry in human subjects. American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology, 298(1), R79–R88. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.00053.2009
19. Helms, E. R., Aragon, A. A., & Fitschen, P. J. (2014). Evidence-based recommendations for natural bodybuilding contest preparation: nutrition and supplementation. Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 11(1), 20.
20. Leproult, R., & Van Cauter, E. (2010). Role of sleep and sleep loss in hormonal release and metabolism. Endocrine development, 17, 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1159/000262524
21. Nedeltcheva, A. V., Kilkus, J. M., Imperial, J., Schoeller, D. A., & Penev, P. D. (2010). Insufficient sleep undermines dietary efforts to reduce adiposity. Annals of internal medicine, 153(7), 435–441. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-153-7-201010050-00006
22. Cava, E., Yeat, N. C., & Mittendorfer, B. (2017). Preserving healthy muscle during weight loss. Advances in nutrition, 8(3), 511-519.
23. Helms, E. R., Zinn, C., Rowlands, D. S., & Brown, S. R. (2014). A systematic review of dietary protein during caloric restriction in resistance trained lean athletes: a case for higher intakes. International journal of sport nutrition and exercise metabolism, 24(2), 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsnem.2013-0054
24. Geiker, N. R. W., Astrup, A., Hjorth, M. F., Sjödin, A., Pijls, L., & Markus, C. R. (2018). Does stress influence sleep patterns, food intake, weight gain, abdominal obesity and weight loss interventions and vice versa?. Obesity Reviews, 19(1), 81-97.
25. Alhassan, S., Kim, S., Bersamin, A., King, A. C., & Gardner, C. D. (2008). Dietary adherence and weight loss success among overweight women: results from the A TO Z weight loss study. International journal of obesity (2005), 32(6), 985–991. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2008.8
26. Stewart, T. M., Williamson, D. A., & White, M. A. (2002). Rigid vs. flexible dieting: association with eating disorder symptoms in nonobese women. Appetite, 38(1), 39–44. https://doi.org/10.1006/appe.2001.0445
27. Moon, J., & Koh, G. (2020). Clinical Evidence and Mechanisms of High-Protein Diet-Induced Weight Loss. Journal of obesity & metabolic syndrome, 29(3), 166–173. https://doi.org/10.7570/jomes20028
28. Prochaska, L. J., Nguyen, X. T., Donat, N., & Piekutowski, W. V. (2000). Effects of food processing on the thermodynamic and nutritive value of foods: literature and database survey. Medical hypotheses, 54(2), 254–262. https://doi.org/10.1054/mehy.1999.0030
29. Fardet, A. (2016). Minimally processed foods are more satiating and less hyperglycemic than ultra-processed foods: a preliminary study with 98 ready-to-eat foods. Food & function, 7(5), 2338-2346.
30. Lally, P., Wardle, J., & Gardner, B. (2011). Experiences of habit formation: a qualitative study. Psychology, health & medicine, 16(4), 484-489.